<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Idioms on Post-Candide</title>
    <link>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/categories/idioms/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Idioms on Post-Candide</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-US</language>
    <copyright>@2025 Post Candide blog powered by Hugo</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/categories/idioms/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Besoin et Fonction</title>
      <link>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/besoin-et-fonction/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/besoin-et-fonction/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A saying I remember from conversations with my uncle forty-odd years ago, and I&amp;rsquo;ve never found it in print, so take the wording as mine-via-his.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;Le besoin fait la fonction. L&amp;rsquo;absence de besoin défait la fonction&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;In any system, where there is a need, a function that meets it tends to emerge; remove the need and the function decays. The nearest English idiom, &amp;ldquo;necessity is the mother of invention,&amp;rdquo; misses twice: it implies an inventor (this is agent-less — the system produces the function, no one has to design it), and it only runs one way (English has no maxim for the un-making). Vestigial organs are the obvious case.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Esprit Critique</title>
      <link>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/esprit-critique/</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/esprit-critique/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;There are close English equivalents but they lack the elegance and weight of the French one in my opinion.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;ldquo;critical thinking&amp;rdquo; remains the closest culturally established term, even if the word &amp;ldquo;critical&amp;rdquo; is too loaded in English&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;ldquo;intellectual curiosity&amp;rdquo; captures some of the spirit, though it&amp;rsquo;s broader. It also has a direct translation commonly used in French: &amp;ldquo;curiosité intellectuelle&amp;rdquo;&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;ldquo;a sharp mind&amp;rdquo; has idiomatic flow but loses the analytical/questioning dimension&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;li&gt;&amp;ldquo;analytical mind&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;questioning mind&amp;rdquo;: closer, but still doesn&amp;rsquo;t roll off the tongue.&lt;/li&gt;&#xA;&lt;/ul&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Esprit critique&amp;rdquo; in French carries a very specific, almost philosophical prestige — the idea of rigorously examining things rather than accepting them at face value — and English tends to express that either through clunkier compound nouns or by borrowing the French outright. And yet, unless the audience knows the idiom, I feel it will be too often understood as &amp;ldquo;critical mind&amp;rdquo; or &amp;ldquo;critical thinking&amp;rdquo;, carrying that negative undertone.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Procès d&#39;intention</title>
      <link>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/proces-d-intention/</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
      <guid>https://blog.postcandide.151e.org/posts/proces-d-intention/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;A French idiom that lack a concise equivalent in English.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;procès d&amp;rsquo;intention&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;you are judging me not for what I said or did but for the intention you&amp;rsquo;ve decided I had, which I can&amp;rsquo;t really defend myself against because you&amp;rsquo;ve already decided you know my inner state better than I do&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
